Qadiani [
Also Called Ahmadiyya Sect ] in the Light of Islam
Title: Qadiani [ Also Called Ahmadiyya Sect ] in the
Light of Islam
Language: English
Iftaa: Muhammad
Salih Al-Munajjid
Short Discription: If
someone is not a qadiani but knows that they believe in a false prophet and
accepts qadianis as a madhab in Islam, are they out of Islam? I believe that
they are out of Islam, and I am acting on that belief in my conduct towards such
people.
______________________________________________________
Question:
If someone is not a qadiani but knows that they believe in a false prophet and accepts qadianis as a madhab in Islam, are they out of Islam? I believe that they are out of Islam, and I am acting on that belief in my conduct towards such people.
If someone is not a qadiani but knows that they believe in a false prophet and accepts qadianis as a madhab in Islam, are they out of Islam? I believe that they are out of Islam, and I am acting on that belief in my conduct towards such people.
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Praise be to Allaah.
- Definition:
Qadianiyyah is a movement that started in
1900 CE as a plot by the British colonialists in the Indian subcontinent, with
the aim of diverting Muslims away from their religion and from the obligation of
jihaad in particular, so that they would not oppose colonialism in the name of
Islam. The mouthpiece of this movement is the magazine Majallat Al-Adyaan
(Magazine if Religions) which was published in English.
- Foundation and prominent
personalities:
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani (1839-1908
CE) was the main tool by means of which Qadianiyyah was founded. He was born in
the village of Qadian, in the Punjab, in India, in 1839 CE. He came from a
family that was well known for having betrayed its religion and country, so
Ghulam Ahmad grew up loyal and obedient to the colonialists in every sense. Thus
he was chosen for the role of a so-called prophet, so that the Muslims would
gather around him and he would distract them from waging jihaad against the
English colonialists. The British government did lots of favours for them, so
they were loyal to the British. Ghulam Ahmad was known among his followers to be
unstable, with a lot of health problems and dependent on drugs.
Among those who confronted him and his
evil da’wah was Shaykh Abu’l-Wafa’ Thana’ al-Amritsari, the leader of Jama’iyyat
Ahl al-Hadeeth fi ‘Umoom al-Hind (The All-India Society of Ahl al-Hadeeth). The
Shaykh debated with him and refuted his arguments, revealing his ulterior
motives and Kufr and the deviation of his way. When Ghulam Ahmad did not come to
his senses, Shaykh Abu’l-Wafa’ challenged him to come together and invoke the
curse of Allaah, such that the one who was lying would die in the lifetime of
the one who was telling the truth. Only a few days passed before Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad al-Qadiani died, in 1908 CE, leaving behind more than fifty books,
pamphlets and articles, among the most important of which are: Izaalat al-Awhaam
(Dispelling illusions), I’jaaz Ahmadi (Ahmadi miracles), Baraaheen Ahmadiyyah
(Ahmadi proofs), Anwaar al-Islam (Lights of Islam), I’jaaz al-Maseeh (Miracles
of the Messiah), al-Tableegh (Conveying (the message))and Tajalliyyaat
Ilaahiyyah (Divine manifestations).
Noor al-Deen (Nuruddin): the first
Khaleefah of the Qadianis. The British put the crown of Khilaafah on his head,
so the disciples (of Ghulam Ahmad) followed him. Among his books is: Fasl
al-Khitaab (Definitive statement).
Muhammad Ali and Khojah Kamaal al-Deen:
the two leaders of the Lahore Qadianis. They are the ones who gave the final
shape to the movement. The former produced a distorted translation into English
of the Qur’aan. His other works include: Haqeeqat al-Ikhtilaaf (The reality of
differences), al-Nubuwwah fi’l-Islam (Prophethood in Islam) and al-Deen
al-Islami (The Islamic religion). As for Khojah Kamaal al-Deen, he wrote a book
called al-Mathal al-A’laa fi’l-Anbiya’ (The highest example of the Prophets),
and other books. This Lahore group of Ahmadis are those who think of Ghulam
Ahmad as a Mujaddid (renewer or reviver of Islam) only, but both groups are
viewed as a single movement because odd ideas that are not seen in the one will
surely be found in the other.
Muhammad Ali: the leader of the Lahore
Qadianis. He was one of those who gave the final shape to Qadianiyyah, a
colonialist spy and the person in charge of the magazine which was the voice of
the Qadianiyyah. He also produced a distorted translation into English of the
Qur’aan. Among his works are Haqeeqat al-Ikhtilaaf (The reality of differences),
and al-Nubuwwah fi’l-Islam (Prophethood in Islam), as stated above.
Muhammad Saadiq, the mufti of the
Qadianiyyah. His works include: Khatim al-Nabiyyeen The seal of the
Prophets).
Basheer Ahmad ibn Ghulam. His works
include: Seerat al-Mahdi (the life of the Mahdi) and Kalimat al-Fasl (Decisive
word).
Mahmood Ahmad ibn Ghulam, his second
Khaleefah. Among his works are: Anwaar al-Khilaafah (Lights of the caliphate),
Tuhfat al-Mulook and Haqeeqat al-Nubuwwah (The reality of
prophethood).
The appointment of the Qadiani
Zafar-Allaah Khan as the first Foreign Minister of Pakistan had a major effect
in supporting this deviant sect, as he gave them a large area in the province of
the Punjab to be their world headquarters, which they named Rabwah (high ground)
as in the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): “… And We gave them refuge on
high ground (rabwah), a place of rest, security and flowing streams.”
[al-Mu’minoon 23:50].
- Their thought and beliefs:
Ghulam Ahmad began his activities as an
Islamic daa’iyah (caller to Islam) so that he could gather followers around him,
then he claimed to be a mujaddid inspired by Allaah. Then he took a further step
and claimed to be the Awaited Mahdi and the Promised Messiah. Then he claimed to
be a Prophet and that his prophethood was higher than that of Muhammad (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
The Qadianis believe that Allaah fasts,
prays, sleeps, wakes up, writes, makes mistakes and has intercourse – exalted be
Allaah far above all that they say.
The Qadiani believes that his god is
English because he speaks to him in English.
The Qadianis believe that Prophethood did
not end with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), but that it
is ongoing, and that Allaah sends a messenger when there is a need, and that
Ghulam Ahmad is the best of all the Prophets.
They believe that Jibreel used to come
down to Ghulam Ahmad and that he used to bring revelation to him, and that his
inspirations are like the Qur’aan.
They say that there is no Qur’aan other
than what the “Promised Messiah” (Ghulam Ahmad) brought, and no hadeeth except
what is in accordance with his teachings, and no Prophet except under the
leadership of Ghulam Ahmad.
They believe that their book was
revealed. Its name is al-Kitaab al-Mubeen and it is different from the Holy
Qur’aan.
They believe that they are followers of a
new and independent religion and an independent Sharee’ah, and that the friends
of Ghulam are like the Sahaabah.
They believe that Qadian is like Madeenah
and Makkah, if not better than them, and that its land is sacred. It is their
Qiblah and the place they make hajj to.
They called for the abolition of jihaad
and blind obedience to the British government because, as they claimed, the
British were “those in authority” as stated in the Qur’aan.
In their view every Muslim is a Kaafir
unless he becomes a Qadiani, and everyone who married a non-Qadiani is also a
kaafir.
They allow alcohol, opium, drugs and
intoxicants.
- Intellectual and ideological roots:
The westernizing movement of Sir Sayyid
Ahmad Khan paved the way for the emergence of the Qadianiyyah, because it had
already spread deviant ideas.
The British made the most of this
opportunity so they started the Qadiani movement and chose a man from a family
that had a history of being agents of the colonialists.
In 1953 CE, there was a popular
revolution in Pakistan which demanded the removal of Zafar-Allaah Khan from the
position of Foreign Minister and that the Qadiani sect should be regarded as a
non-Muslim minority. In this uprising around ten thousand Muslims were martyred,
and they succeeded in having the Qadiani minister removed from
office.
In Rabee’ al-Awwal 1394 AH (April 1974),
a major conference was held by the Muslim World League in Makkah, which was
attended by representatives of Muslim organizations from around the world. This
conference announced that this sect is Kaafir and is beyond the pale of Islam,
and told Muslims to resist its dangers and not to cooperate with the Qadianis or
bury their dead in Muslim graveyards.
The Majlis al-Ummah in Pakistan (the
central parliament) debated with the Qadiani leader Mirza Naasir Ahmad, and he
was refuted by Shaykh Mufti Mahmood (may Allaah have mercy on him). The debate
went on for nearly thirty hours but Naasir Ahmad was unable to give answers and
the Kufr of this group was exposed, so the Majlis issued a statement that the
Qadianis should be regarded as a non-Muslim minority.
- Among the factors that make Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad an obvious Kaafir are the following:
His claim to be a Prophet
His abolition of the duty of jihaad, to
serve the interests of the colonialists.
His saying that people should no longer
go on Hajj to Makkah, and his substitution of Qadian as the place of pilgrimage.
His anthropomorphism or likening Allaah to human beings.
His anthropomorphism or likening Allaah to human beings.
His belief in the transmigration of souls
and incarnation.
His attributing a son to Allaah and his
claim to be the son of God.
His denying that Prophethood ended with
Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his regarding the door
of Prophethood to be open to “any Tom, Dick or Harry”.
The Qadianis have strong ties with
Israel. Israel has opened centres and schools for them, and helped them to
publish a magazine which is their mouthpiece, to print books and publications
for distribution worldwide.
The fact that they are influenced by
Judaism, Christianity and al-Baatiniyyah is clear from their beliefs and
practices, even though they claim to be Muslims.
- Their spread and positions of
influence:
Most of the Qadianis nowadays live in
India and Pakistan, with a few in Israel and the Arab world. They are trying,
with the help of the colonialists, to obtain sensitive positions in all the
places where they live.
The Qadianis are very active in Africa
and in some western countries. In Africa they have more than 5,000 teachers and
dai’yahs working full-time to call people to Qadianiyyah. Their wide-spread
activity proves that they have the support of the colonialists.
The British government is also supporting
this movement and making it easy for their followers to get positions in world
governments, corporate administration and consulates. Some of them are also
high-ranking officers in the secret services.
In calling people to their beliefs, the
Qadianis use all kinds of methods, especially educational means, because they
are highly-educated and there are many scientists, engineers and doctors in
their ranks. In Britain there is a satellite TV channel called Islamic TV which
is run by the Qadianis.
- From the above, it is clear
that:
Qadianiyyah is a misguided group, which
is not part of Islam at all. Its beliefs are completely contradictory to Islam,
so Muslims should beware of their activities, since the ‘Ulama’ (scholars) of
Islam have stated that they are Kaafirs.
For more information see: Al-Qadianiyyah
by Ihsaan Ilaahi Zaheer.
(Translator’s note: this book is available
in English under the title “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi
Zaheer)
Reference: Al-Mawsoo’ah al-Muyassarah
fi’l-Adyaan al-Madhaahib wa’l-Ahzaab al-Mu’aasirah by Dr. Maani’ Hammad
al-Juhani, 1/419-423
- The following statement was published by
the Islamic Fiqh Council (Majma’ al-Fiqh al-Islami):
After discussing the question put to the
Islamic Fiqh Council in Capetown, South Africa, concerning the ruling on the
Qadianis and their off-shoot which is known as Lahoriyyah, and whether they
should be counted as Muslims or not, and whether a non-Muslim is qualified to
examine an issue of this nature:
In the light of research and documents
presented to the members of the council concerning Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
al-Qadiani, who emerged in India in the last century and to whom is attributed
the Qadiani and Lahori movements, and after pondering the information presented
on these two groups, and after confirming that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to be
a prophet who received revelation, a claim which is documented in his own
writings and speeches, some of which he claimed to have received as revelation,
a claim which he propagated all his life and asked people to believe in, just as
it is also well-known that he denied many other things which are proven to be
essential elements of the religion of Islam
in the light of the above, the Council
issued the following statement:
Firstly: the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
to be a prophet or a messenger and to receive revelation are clearly a rejection
of proven and essential elements of Islam, which unequivocally states that
Prophethood ended with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and
that no revelation will come to anyone after him. This claim made by Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad makes him and anyone who agrees with him an apostate who is beyond
the pale of Islam. As for the Lahoriyyah, they are like the Qadianiyyah: the
same ruling of apostasy applies to them despite the fact that they described
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a shadow and manifestation of our Prophet Muhammad (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
Secondly: it is not appropriate for a
non-Muslim court or judge to give a ruling on who is a Muslim and who is an
apostate, especially when this goes against the consensus of the scholars and
organizations of the Muslim Ummah. Rulings of this nature are not acceptable
unless they are issued by a Muslim scholar who knows all the requirements for
being considered a Muslim, who knows when a person may be deemed to have
overstepped the mark and become an apostate, who understands the realities of
Islam and kufr, and who has comprehensive knowledge of what is stated in the
Qur’aan, Sunnah and scholarly consensus. The ruling of a court of that nature is
invalid. And Allaah knows best.
Majma’ al-Fiqh al-Islami,
p. 13
0 Comments:
Post a Comment